Materials

Condition of off-limit areas in March 2020

Figure reproduced from Fukushima Prefecture website

Most of Iitate Village was lifted (evacuation order preparation zone and restricted residential area), but there is a part of the village ( Nagadoro area) that is difficult to return to.

Most of Minamisoma City was lifted (Evacuation Order Lifting Preparation Zone and Restricted Population Zone), but there is an off-limit areas in Namie Town and some adjacent areas.

All evacuation order preparation zones and restricted residential zones in Kawamata Town have been lifted, and there is no off-limit areas.

Part of Namie Town was lifted (evacuation order preparation zone and restricted residential area), but 80% of the town is still in an off-limit areas.

Most of Katsurao Village was lifted (evacuation order preparation zone and restricted residential area), but a part adjacent to Namie Town remains in an off-limit areas.

A small part of Futaba Town was lifted (evacuation order preparation zone), but most of the town is in the off-limit areas.

Part of Okuma Town was lifted (evacuation order preparation zone and restricted residential area), but more than half of the entire town is in the off-limit areas.

Tomioka Town was widely lifted (evacuation order preparation zone and restricted residential area), but there is an off-limit areas in Okuma Town and some adjacent areas.

The evacuation order preparation zone and restricted residential area in Naraha Machi were lifted, and there is no off-limit areas.

The evacuation order preparation zone and restricted residential area in Kawauchi Village were lifted, and there is no off-limit areas.

Reprinted from the Rikuzentakata City East Japan Earthquake Verification Report

Resident Opinion Survey in Nuclear Affected Municipalities in 2019
Excerpts from the survey results (summary)

Intention to return by generation
  • Regarding the willingness to return, by generation, generally the higher the respondent’s generation, the higher the percentage of those who answered “have returned” and “would like to return”.
Current Housing Type
  • Regarding the current housing type other than those who have returned to their original municipality, the percentage of respondents who answered “emergency temporary housing (prefabricated, free of charge)” or “emergency temporary housing (rented, free of charge)” decreased in each town and village.
  • 「The percentage of respondents who answered “owner-occupied (owned by you or your family)” increased in each town/village, with approximately 60-80% of respondents acquiring owner-occupied houses.
Conditions necessary to determine return
  • For those who responded that they “have not yet made a decision” in terms of their willingness to return, “reopening of medical care, nursing care, etc.” was the most common condition necessary for them to make a decision to return, followed by “radiation levels,” “reopening of commercial facilities,” and “status of return of surrounding residents” in most of the municipalities.
Reasons for deciding not to return
  • The top reasons given by those who answered “will not return” for their decision not to return included: “I have already established a foundation for my life,” “It is more convenient to live in the evacuation area,” and “I am concerned about the medical environment”.

Postscript

When I visited the coastal areas of eastern Japan after March 11, 2012, during the series of holidays that began at the end of April, I was simply stunned by the sheer force of nature. As an organization of patients with intractable diseases, I had no idea what to do or where to start. Even the accident at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant left me stunned and amazed at the immense power of nature and the powerlessness and recklessness of human power in comparison. I was just perplexed by the challenge of what we could do as a patient organization and what we should do.

The Intractable Disease Control Division, Health Bureau, Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare requested that we collect memoirs, poems, haiku, and other works by patients and families with intractable diseases from the Sanriku coast. However, we were unable to locate the patients and their families, and were only able to collect a few cases by asking for cooperation from municipal offices and public health centers.(This commissioned project published reports over a two-year period.)

One day, one of the board members of a patient group in Fukushima Prefecture said to me, “Fukushima seems to be fading away. I immediately called on my fellow patients to join me on a tour to experience Tohoku and Fukushima with their own eyes, regardless of whether they were for or against nuclear power plants.

Guided by patient groups from Iwate and Fukushima who had already visited local authorities and patients, we conducted a tour of the Sanriku coast and the nuclear power plant evacuation area. The number of participants was much larger than planned. Our annual tour, which could be called a fixed-point observation, began at a hotel in front of JR Haranomachi Station in Minamisoma, which had finally reopened.

In March 2020, when we made our final tour, we were able to see a greatly changed picture of reconstruction. However, there were still some gates that had been sealed in contaminated areas where people were not allowed to return.

Houses collapse with each passing year. People’s lives will never return to normal. Even though the elementary and junior high schools in that area seemingly stand still in time as they were then, the children will never return there. I felt that people were slowly moving toward a new way of life. However, we also remembered that we must not forget to learn from history.

I would like to express my heartfelt condolences to the many victims.

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to all the patient groups that helped us prepare and execute this tour, to everyone who participated in the tour, and most of all to everyone who guided us and shared their horror and painful experiences of the earthquake and tsunami. I also would like to thank everyone who worked on the compilation of the report.

Although this is the end of the tour by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare’s support program for patients with intractable diseases, I would like to continue my personal visit in the future.

(Editor in Chief: Tateo Ito)

Editorial board members

  • Tateo Ito, Director, JPA
  • Masaru Fujiwara, Former Director, JPA
  • Yukiko Mori, Director, JPA
  • Kunio Tsuji, Direfctor, JPA
  • Osamu Koseki, Miyagi Patient Council
  • Yoshihiro Watanabe, The Fukushima Prefecture Council of Intractable Disease Organizations
  • Kyoko Yahaba, Iwate Prefecture Council of Intractable Diseases and Related Disorders
  • Kozue Hiyoshi, Secretariat, JPA
  • Keita Otsubo, Secretariat, JPA
Past publications related to the Great East Japan Earthquake by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare’s Support Program for Patients with Intractable Diseases

Research and Documentation Project “Patient and Family Voices Project”
It can be downloaded from the JPA website.
https://nanbyo.jp/earthquake/

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) subsidy for support projects for patients with intractable diseases

Visits to disaster-affected areas and support for patient groups

3.11 The Great East Japan Earthquake & Fukushima Firsthand Experience Tour 10 Years of Documentation

Published: February 10, 2021
JPA : Japan Patients Association

<Secretariat>

  • Japan Patients Association (JPA)
    Iidaabshi Hightown 610 Shimomiyabi-cho2-28 Shinjuku-ku Tokyo, 162-0822, Japan
  • TEL:+81-36280-7734 FAX: +81-36280-7735
  • Email: jpa@ia2.itkeeper.ne.jp
  • Website: https://nanbyo.jp/

BACK TO TOP